Monday, January 29, 2007

An article written by Bob Parks

One Citizen's Response


<> by Bob Parks

The following a citizen's response to the President's State of the Union address and the Democrat response. This response is to the Men and Women of the United States Armed Forces.

With all the political events of the past week, I was going to issue you an apology. Seeing how the people of whom I would be apologizing for are self-centered, self-righteous, better-than-anyone citizens of our great nation, let it suffice to say I am more disgusted than anything else.

I can't even come close to knowing what you must be going through in Iraq and Afghanistan. During the mid-to-late eighties, I served onboard the USS Midway, at that time the only forward-deployed carrier in the fleet. Her nickname was the "USS Never Dock." Our average deployment was nine months out of the year.

Our bright spot was that we would soon be going home. Unfortunately, you on the ground are not guaranteed a plane ride home, and with that comes my disgust for those who don't think twice about playing games with your lives, not knowing what life is really like in theater while wearing your uniform.
More...It's the little things the anti-war left and their media do on an almost daily basis that pisses me off. For example, the liberals in this country routinely remind us all how many of you have died serving your country. Every new big number warrants a new story and fancy graphics. The left proudly displays that number on the sides of their homes and on billboards.

Will anyone in the media tell me how many of the enemy you've killed? When is CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN going to give us that number, complete with fanfare? As the object of most wars is to win, and the easy way of judging success is in the body count of our enemy, why haven't we heard this number? Are we even going to?

Considering the side the kills the most has the easier path to victory, how can Democrats say we're losing without telling us what the score is? Are YOU really losing? How many times have you had to retreat during a battle? Why are we at home being told you're not able to get the job done?

The Democrats considered their recent electoral victory a referendum on the war that they say you are losing. They consider your actions futile and we need to bring you home now. You know what's going on over there. Some who've visited you say that we're not hearing the whole story; your many successes, and hearing about the people in Iraq whose lives you've touched by your very liberation.

Thus my disgust for people who think so less of you and your potential, that they want to bring you home like some little kid picked on by a school bully. The only difference here is that today's bully will leave a bomb in your house if he's not left in the schoolyard with a blood nose.

I'm personally disgusted by those who take for granted the fact that most of you not only joined the military, but most chose to join your branch. Some chose to work in the air, at sea, or on the ground. You knew where you'd be going, and some have even chosen to go back.

There are some here who take all that is life for granted while taking their spoiled, screaming kids to Chuck E. Cheese. They go with the comfort of knowing that a roadside bomb won't go off in the parking lot. There are some that take their freedom for granted, as they know a crackpot won't detonate himself and a pack of ball bearings inside the local mall. There are way too many in American who go through life thinking nothing bad will ever happen to them and your sacrifice is the last explanation that enters their narcissistic brains.

Many who went to work on September 11, 2001 sure as hell felt safe that morning. Will someone in the media tell me how many of the people who aided and supported the hijackers' mission are dead today, never to return for an encore?

I support you. I'm not going to say, "I support the troops." The word "troops" is impersonal and political. You have names and you chose a branch. I support the Men and Women of the United States Armed Forces. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. As I'm not getting paid to write this, I am not using you. Many who are getting paid to play a part in a war YOU chose to fight are, and they want you dead. Should you all die, they can point their fingers in all of our faces and tell us they were right. It's all about them.

I know that's harsh and I'll piss off those anti-war types. Like they have it bad. Would they have the guts to trade places with you, or stay at home and protest on streets you are keeping safe?

They now wish to pass some resolution in the Congress and the Senate that says they "support" you but believe you were sent to fight a war you cannot win. Because of some pansy-ass politicians on both sides of the aisle who are more concerned with their own power than your lives, they want no part of victory.

Should every one of you come home in a flag-draped coffin, they will declare it a victory. If you are victorious, they will be forever stained as cowards who not only devalued your efforts, but could give a damn of the sure slaughter of possibly millions of Iraqis that would occur upon your evacuation.

So Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her colleagues have decided to issue a timetable to the Iraqi government. Who does she think she is?

Does Speaker Pelosi and her Democrat brethren risk assassination by car bomb or semi-automatic machinegun fire on a daily basis? While traveling in Switzerland and calling America a social outcast, is my disgrace of a senator, John Kerry, supporting you or putting a bullseye on everyone one your heads?

Once you leave the region with the insurgency still intact, who will be sent in next to resolve the failed diplomacy, France?

You're on the ground; let me ask you. Do you think the people shooting rocket-propelled grenades, and rigging bombs under dead bodies, are ready to sit down and talk with you? These people are willing to blow up their own children to defeat "The Great Satan." So we should sit down and talk with them? You first, Senator Kerry.

Those who use you for their own political gain are below the elements that make up dirt. They recite and teach children to recite such nonsense as "Bush lied, people died." They pound their chests while declaring you went to Iraq looking for weapons of mass destruction that were never there. I believe President Bush when he sent you to find them. It's a shame that while the UN, distracted by Germany, France, and Russia, stalled in enforcing one of more than a dozen resolutions, the dearly departed Saddam Hussein probably hid them probably in Syria. It would seem Saddam knew how to play our liberals after all.

They claim that President Bush deliberately sent you into battle with inadequate training and equipment.

Wars were historically fought on battlefields. Wars were historically fought between nations in uniform. This battle, as you know, is different.

You are fighting representatives from many nations who wear no distinguishable clothing, and shoot at you not on a battlefield, but in cities, in homes behind woman and children. If you were initially prepared to fight this kind of war, the left would have called you savages.

Our greatest impediment is our politicians and their media's willingness to alert our enemy to your every move, including reinforcements. They revel in their self-importance and in their arrogance forget the enemy watches ESPN and CNN. Have you seen enemy media declaring they are losing, while it's probably the truth? Have we seen their leaders forced to state to their nation what the next strategy would be?

Whenever you see another Democrat tell you that you're there because our Commander-in-Chief lied about the existence, thus the initial mission to find and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, remember this….

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

  • President Bill Clinton, February 4, 1998

Two weeks Clinton added….

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

And remember this….

"Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

  • Secretary of State Madeline Albright, February 18, 1998

And this….

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."

  • National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, February 18, 1998, referring to Saddam Hussein

And this….

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

  • Democrat senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John F. Kerry, and others in a letter to President Clinton on October 9, 1998

And finally….

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process. The responsibility of the United States in this conflict is to eliminate weapons of mass destruction, to minimize the danger to our troops and to diminish the suffering of the Iraqi people."

  • Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

I included the dates as these statements were made years before George W. Bush was elected President of the United States. Most believed those weapons were there and said as much. They are lying now to a memory-challenged media who wants you to lose as much as they enemy.

Please do those of us who consider you more than a number a favor. Screw what the liberals are saying: you are not losing. Victory means not only liberating Iraq. You will liberate yourselves. You will free yourselves of people who are elitists. People who never knew self-sacrifice on the level you endure every day.

People who play soldiers in movies consider themselves experts in diplomacy, strategy, and actual warfare. As you well know, al Qaeda is not shooting blanks and reading a script. While this is real for you, some in the safety back home lament their daily routines, thus they hold up signs and listen to the wisdom of Tim Robbins and Jane Fonda. Unfortunately this war will never be over until you kill enough of the enemy there and shame those who use you here.

Does that make me a warmonger?

No. I am a veteran, a citizen of the United States of America, and I want you to win this war and come home. That's as it should be, right?

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Super Bowl



Or




Will this be Manning's year? Grossman hasn't impressed me...to many on or off games.


Saturday, January 27, 2007

No pictures this time out

Forgot the camera yesterday (can you believe that) so didn't come away with any pictures of Bear.It maybe a little while for him to get socialized with other dogs but he is doing better.His think now is to get out and run with other dogs then as things get a little rough he'll run back to the bench and hid underneath.

Friday, January 26, 2007

Another "Paw Park"

Took Bear over to another of the great County Parks.Walsingham was the name of this one. A little out of my way for a daily thing , But I wanted to get a look a the the dog park to compare with what I had been too already. We are so lucky here in Pinellas County to have such beautiful and well kept parks.Now that I'm into bicycling with Bear,it is really enjoyable.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Chestnut Park Jan 21, 2007

"Those ears get in your way little guy?


"Lets see if these guys are friendly"


" Look at the size of this guy dad"



"Why are they all running around like that?"


"Sure are a lot of dogs dad!"



He has to check out all the other dogs.


Bear not sure


Front entrance



Wednesday, January 17, 2007

New Bike


I believe I'm reverting to

my younger days by

going out and buying

new bicycle.

And just like a kid,I had

to buy accessories and

adjust everything to my

liking.

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Friday, January 05, 2007

What I'm learning to "Socialize" Bear




HE JUST WANTS TO SAY "HI!"
By Suzanne Clothier

Note: This is an abbreviated version of He Just Wants to Say HI! Please see the full length version for more complete information.

Sitting quietly on the mall bench beside my husband, I was minding my own business when the man approached. I glanced up as the man sat next to me. He was a bit close for my comfort, so I edged a little closer to my husband who, busy reading a book, ignored me. Still feeling a bit uncomfortable with the strange man so close, I then turned my head slightly away from him, politely indicating I was not interested in any interaction. To my horror, the man leaned over me and began licking my neck while rudely groping me.

When I screamed and pushed him away, my trouble really began. My husband angrily threw me to the ground, yelling at me "Why did you do that? He was only trying to be friendly and say hi! What a touchy bitch you are! You're going to have to learn to behave better in public."

People all around us stared and shook their heads sadly. I heard a few murmuring that they thought my husband should do something about my behavior; some even mentioned that he shouldn't have such a violent woman out in public until I'd been trained better. As my husband dragged me to the car, I noticed that the man who had groped me had gone a bit further down the mall and was doing the same thing to other women.

This is a silly scenario, isn't it? First, anyone who knows me knows that I would never be in a mall except under considerable duress. More seriously, no rational human being would consider my response to the man's rudeness as inappropriate or vicious. By invading my personal space, the man crossed the lines of decent, civilized behaviour; my response would be considered quite justified.

That my husband might punish me for responding to such rudeness by screaming and pushing the offender away is perhaps the most ridiculous aspect of this scenario. If he were to act in this way, there would be no doubt in the minds of even the most casual observers that his ego was of far greater importance than my safety or comfort, and that he was sorely lacking even rudimentary empathy for how I might be feeling in this situation.

Fortunately for me, this scenario is completely imaginary. Unfortunately for many dogs, it is a very real scenario that is repeated far too often. Inevitably, as the owners who have allowed their dogs to act rudely retreat from the situation, there are comments made about "that aggressive dog" (meaning the dog whose space had been invaded) and the classic comment, usually said in hurt tones, "He only wanted to say hi!"

While there are many frustrating aspects of being a dog trainer, one of the most disturbing scenarios is the situation where a dog is acting appropriately but nonetheless is punished (in the name of "training") by humans who do not understand what constitutes normal canine behavior and responses.

Sadly, normal behavior is quickly labeled "problem" behavior, and the dog is now a "problem dog." Depending on the skill and awareness of the trainer or instructor, the dog may be merely puzzled or irritated by well meaning attempts to desensitize or re-condition the behavior or actually punished quite severely using any number of horrific and senseless techniques.

During an off-lead play session at our camp, two adolescent dogs began to roughhouse at top speed, resulting in one of them crashing hard into an older dog who'd been minding his own business. With a loud roar, he chased the offender for a few steps to make his point: "Watch where the heck you're going!"

A few minutes later, with the game still going strong, we watched as that same youngster found himself headed once again on a collision course with the older dog. It seemed another crash and altercation were inevitable. To the surprise of many who were watching, the youngster used all of his skills to avoid the crash, neatly swerving past the older dog who made no comment. The puppy had learned that no matter how excited he might be by the game, he still had an obligation to be polite.

We would look with a raised eyebrow at a mother who allowed a child to simply carom around a room bouncing off people and did nothing to calm the child, and who told those her child had shoved and pushed that, "He's just over excited." Just as parents bear some responsibility for their children's actions, dog owners have a responsibility to help their puppies act in an appropriate way - not to excuse rudeness.

Sometimes, this requires that we not allow a young dog (or a dog of any age) to escalate to such a high level of excitement and arousal. As a rule of thumb, the more excited and emotional a dog becomes, the less capable they are of thinking clearly and acting appropriately. (This is also true of all other animals, including people.) Wise handlers know that when emotions are running high, a cool down period is a good choice to avoid problems. Sometimes, helping a young dog learn what is appropriate requires the assistance of a normal, well socialized dog who can make his or her point without leaving anything but a clear message imprinted upon the puppy.

Normal dogs, like normal people, are often incredibly tolerant of the antics of youngsters. The tolerance level is highly individual and dependent upon the dog's experience with puppies. Dogs without much experience with puppies may not be nearly as tolerant as dogs who have seen a lot of puppies come and go.

Tolerance levels are also highly dependent upon the youngster's age; there are different expectations for what constitutes appropriate behavior at any given age. What we might find acceptable behavior in a 3 year old child would be frowned upon in an 8 year old. Dogs also have a timetable in their heads - puppies under 16 weeks of age can usually take appalling liberties with an adult dog. As Dunbar notes, there appears to be a "puppy license" of sorts, possession of which entitles you to be an utter pest without much repercussion. Past the age of 4 ½ months, the "puppy license" expires as hormone levels shift and psychological changes occur. At this point, adult dogs begin to gradually insist on more controlled, respectful interactions from youngsters.

No matter what the breed, no matter how much genetic manipulation may have muted or inhibited certain behaviors, a dog is a dog is a dog. And the basics of dog-to-dog communications remain the same: a growl means back off in any breed's language, a tail held high and stiffly is a warning, rolling over on your back is an apology, etc.

My experience has been that it is owners of breeds considered non-aggressive that cause the most problems in dog-to-dog interactions simply by being unaware that their dog is rude. To the owners of non-aggressive breeds, there doesn't appear to be any thought that rudeness can take many forms. Anyone can recognize that a dog lunging and snarling is being rude. Far too few folks recognize that simply getting into another's dog space - however sweetly and quietly - is just as rude in the world of dogs. Owners of rude dogs do not perceive their dogs' actions as rude; they see only "friendliness," as if the behavior for greeting people is the same as greeting another dog - it's not! Thus the classic line, "He's only trying to say ‘hi!'"

Like people, dogs have varying thresholds for what I call the "fool factor." Consider yourself in this situation: you are walking down the street, and a group of loud, noisy teenagers - busy at the center of their own world - bumps into you and knocks you down. Do you smile at them? Do you mutter, "Watch where you're going!" as you brush yourself off? Do you get quite vocal in expressing your displeasure?

All depends on your tolerance threshold. It also depends on your mood, your health, the various stresses at work in your life, etc. Imagine that you had just won the lottery moments before they bumped into you. Chances are pretty good you'd be far more tolerant than if you'd just come from a meeting with the IRS. What if you'd been mugged a year earlier by a similar group of young hooligans? Chances are good that you might view this group as potentially dangerous, again altering your possible response to their rudeness.

Our dogs are no different. Each dog - no matter what the breed - has his own tolerance threshold, and that threshold is variable as a result of many factors, including basic breed characteristics. Some breeds have been selectively bred to have a very high tolerance threshold because they are asked to work in large groups. Fox hounds come to mind as a breed specifically selected for tolerance of other dogs. Generally speaking, the guardian breeds by their very nature and job descriptions are not meant to work in groups and have a stronger sense of personal space, thus are usually much less tolerant of rudeness.

Bad experiences can make a dog quite sensitive to rude behavior by other dogs. From the dog's point of view, there is the very real possibility that such rudeness could become an actual attack - it has in the past. Health problems can also affect a dog's tolerance level. A dog who is in pain (whether just muscle sore from hard work or play, or from a disease such as hip dysphasia or the creeping onset of arthritis) will have far less tolerance than he might when he's feeling fine.

We cannot expect our dogs to be saints - at least not until we can rise to that level of tolerance ourselves. And that's unlikely to happen any time soon. We can expect our dogs to be tolerant to the degree that we educate them, socialize them and protect them - with respect to their individual needs and boundaries.

To my way of thinking, a critical part of the relationships I have with my animals is this promise: "I will protect you." And to the best of my abilities, I do not violate this promise in any way.

A few years ago, I was invited to be part of a fund-raising dog walk. One of my duties was to lead the entire group on the first lap of the walk. I had chosen my oldest bitch, Vali, to accompany me. As we waited, hundreds of dogs and handlers assembled in the park. Many of the dogs were quite excited. Some dogs were only under borderline control. Vali laid quietly at my side, watching it all with great tolerance.

One particular dog caught my eye - a huge yellow Labrador who was dragging a small child behind him as he ploughed through the crowd. I watched as this dog marked not only every tree or bush he passed, but also several pants legs of unsuspecting people. More aware handlers quietly gathered up their dogs and moved out of Mr. Rude's path, thus avoiding potential altercations.

As he moved closer to us, I saw Vali's head turn toward him and become quite still. Her eyes began to harden as she assessed - quite accurately - just how rude a dog this was. I could see her contemplating possible responses should the Lab be so rude as to invade her space (which in such public settings is perhaps 2-3 feet from her body). The only intervention necessary was to gently touch her on the head and say, "Yes. I see him. And you're right - he is rude. I'll handle it." Then I stepped slightly in front of her so that if he approached, he would have to first come through me. Immediately, Vali relaxed and went back to watching the crowd in general though she did keep an eye on Mr. Rude. Fortunately for us, Mr. Rude veered off to hassle another dog and the
moment passed.

There were other ways I could have responded. I could have seen Vali's very appropriate response as potential aggression, and told her harshly, "Leave it!" To my way of thinking, that does not acknowledge or respect her feelings; it merely demonstrates my own fears about losing control of my dog's behavior.

I could have ignored the subtle signs that she had some concerns about Mr. Rude, and waited until he invaded her space then punished her for defending herself against rudeness. To my way of thinking, that would violate my promise to protect those I love, and then add insult to injury by punishing her for protecting herself. Keeping that promise to my dogs means that I am obligated to watch for any sign that they are beginning to feel concerned about a situation, and to act quickly to eliminate or minimize their concerns.

Unfortunately for many dogs labeled "dog aggressive," a weird loop begins to form between dog and handler in the struggle to deal with this behavior. Understandably shocked when their dog exhibits any kind of aggressive behavior, the handler begins to scan the world at large for anything that might trigger that behavior again. They become hyper-alert to any potential situation, and upon sighting a potential problem, grab the lead with a death grip in order to control their "aggressive dog."

Their own concern coupled with the death grip escalates the dog's anxiety and aggression, usually resulting in precisely the behavior they sought to avoid in the first place. Far more insidious, however, is the message sent to the dog whose handler pays intense attention to the world at large but none to the dog himself!

In one of my seminars, a woman presented her terrier Brisky with the complaint that he was "dog aggressive." In reality, Brisky had very little off-lead socialization, was quite fearful of other dogs, and all his "aggression" was nothing more than defensive offence. If given a choice, Brisky would have happily left the room and driven himself home.

The woman looked like a Secret Service agent on presidential detail - she never stopped scanning the room for any potential problem. Was that person going to get up and walk their dog past Brisky? Was that dog going to turn around and lie down facing Brisky? She saw potential disaster in every slight adjustment or movement of another dog. What she never looked at was Brisky himself. Consequently, his "sudden" explosions always came as a shock to her.

I felt very sorry for Brisky. He sent many signals to his owner that he was worried and afraid. But all his communications were all ignored until he felt so pressured that he had to protect himself in the only way he knew how. It is very hard to feel safe and protected if the person you are with pays no attention to you.

When working with people like Brisky's owners, my goal is to get them to watch the dog, not the world at large. If their attention is outward, instead of on the dog, they will miss the early signs that their dog is feeling uncomfortable and needs some help. The earlier the dog receives acknowledgment for what he's feeling, is helped to cope with the situation, and given evidence that you understand his concern and will deal with it on his behalf, the less likely his behavior is to escalate into dramatic displays. This is true whether it's a dog like Vali who believes that a rude dog should be taken down a peg or a dog like Brisky who is afraid.

I encourage handlers to be quite active in protecting their dog - whether that means quietly walking away to a safer area, or, when that's not possible, literally stepping in physically to present the first line of defense. Stepping in between two dogs is a classic act of leadership. Dogs do it with other dogs all the time, so this same gesture coming from a human leader is understood and appreciated.

Brisky visibly relaxed when his owner began watching him, not the world; by the end of the day, he was far more tolerant of situations that had previously triggered his explosions. No doubt he felt safer - someone was finally listening to what he had to say, and offering him help (such as changing his body posture and thus his emotional state) when he needed it.

The owner reported that she felt calmer knowing that Brisky would let her know how he was feeling, and that she could help him before he felt the need to protect himself. Instead of having to scan the world at large constantly, she could relax and focus only on what Brisky told her about the world as he saw it.

In my opinion, an instructor's responsibility is not only to educate dogs and owners, but also to act to protect each dog from the other members of the class. This requires an ever-deepening understanding of canine behavior, and an attendance to subtleties of behavior that foretell problems brewing.

Certainly, no matter how aware or dedicated a handler, it is not possible to stop other dogs from being rude - or, more to the point, it is not possible to educate all other handlers so that they won't allow their dogs to be rude. I believe fools and rudeness are widespread, and to the best of my knowledge, there's no concerted government program to eradicate either rudeness or foolishness. (If there were, Capitol Hill would soon be a ghost town. . .)

Here's my advice for dealing with the "fool factor."

1. Socialize your dog thoroughly with other dogs; for puppies, choose playmates of a similar age and adults who have been well socialized themselves. This means off-lead socialization, not sniffing noses at the end of the lead. The more experience a dog has with other dogs, the more refined his judgment will become about what constitutes rude or foolish behavior and how best to deal with it. He'll also learn how to be a polite dog himself.

If a dog has not or cannot be well socialized, be realistic about what you can expect from him in his dealings with other dogs. This may mean altering your training or competition goals to be fair to a dog who may not be able to cope with the stresses of these situations.

2. When socializing your dog under someone else's instruction or guidance, be careful. Some instructors and trainers are appalling ignorant about basic behavior, and unable to set up a positive socialization situation. If you feel uncomfortable with a situation, remove your dog. It only takes a few seconds for a bad experience to leave a lasting impression, particularly on a young dog.

Just turning dogs loose together to play is not socialization. There has to be supervision, and intervention when the potential for a problem appears. The instructor must pay attention to each individual dog as well as the pairings or subsets within the whole play group. If one dog is getting overly excited, it's time to gently capture him, take him out of the play group and calm him down before letting him play again. If a fearful dog has reached his limit, it's time to remove him from the group and give him time to relax and build his courage before putting him back in. If a particular dog or dogs begins to gang up on another dog, time to break up the brat pack.

3. Watch your dog. Your dog will tell you all you need to know about his perception of the world. When you're with him, really be with him. Pay attention to his behavior. Position yourself and/or the dog so that the dog is always in your peripheral vision. Practice checking on your dog often. If he appears to be concerned, find out why. And then help him. Protect him.

Teach yourself to recognize the small, subtle signs that he's shifted out of a perfectly relaxed state of mind. These may be as simple as the tilt of an ear, a raised eyebrow, a slight holding of the breath or tensing of the muscles. Each dog is different - learn to read your own dog.

If you can't watch your dog in a situation where there are potential problems, put him somewhere safe. I've seen far too many incidents occur unnecessarily because a handler was engrossed in a conversation or fascinated by what was happening in the ring and ignoring the dog at their side.

When a handler's attention is elsewhere, I call this handling by Braille - meaning, knowing nothing more than that there was still pressure on the lead and thus the dog was still present. Unbeknownst to you, the dog could be acting rudely himself or trying to avoid a rude dog. Handle your dog with awareness, not by the length of your lead.

4. Be pro-active in protecting your dog. If you see a fool and his rude dog headed your way, do your best to protect your dog. If possible, walk away, lightly and quietly asking your dog to come with you. Be sure you are breathing and relaxed - don't let your apprehension about a possible altercation impact negatively on your dog.

If you can't walk away, try to get the fool to stop. Position yourself between the fool and your dog. If necessary, loudly & firmly tell the approaching person that your dog is not good with other dogs. In close quarters where there really aren't any options for moving away, shield your dog with your own body. (Remember, stepping between dogs is an act of protective leadership.)

If you need to, sharply tell the fool to "please control your rude dog." You'll probably get a dirty look (fools rarely believe they or their dogs are rude and are shocked when spoken to sharply) but chances are good they'll at least make a show at controlling their dog or move huffily away from you.

DOs & DON'Ts

DON'T bring an intolerant or undersocialized dog to a puppy kindergarten or other concentrations of rudeness & stupidity when you know he can't handle puppies, stupidity, or rudeness!
DON'T put your dog in a situation you or he are not prepared to handle.
DON'T turn a rude puppy or dog loose with an intolerant adult.
DON'T expect your dog to like every dog he meets (at least until you like every person you meet.)
DON'T allow your dog to become overexcited or rude - help him find a more appropriate behavior or remove him briefly from the triggering situation
DON'T allow other people to allow their dogs to be rude to your dog.
DON'T ignore your dog or what your dog tells you about his feelings.
DON'T punish a dog for telling another dog to get the hell out of his face.
DON'T punish an adult for reminding a puppy to mind his manners.
DON'T let your training or competition goals overwhelm your good sense - always be fair to your dog.

DO respect the fact that your dog has a need for & a right to his personal space.
DO socialize your dog so that he's wise in the ways of other dogs.
DO accept the inexplicable disliking that your dog may have for another dog.
DO build your dog's tolerance levels through repeated, positive experiences.
DO continually educate yourself regarding normal and appropriate canine behavior in any given situation.
DO plan ahead to how you will handle difficult situations, people or dogs.
DO earn your dog's trust by keeping your promise to protect him.
DO pay attention to your dog when you are with him.
DO insist that your dog behave politely.
DO respect that your dog's individual needs may or may not be in line with your training or competition goals.
DO put your dog first - all your hopes, dreams, titles & goals all mean nothing if you ignore the needs, fears and realities of who your dog is.
DO honor & respect your dog's concerns, whether or not you share them. (Remember how your mom left the light in the hall on at night when you were a kid? It probably wasn't because she was afraid of the dark.)

Bicycle ride with Bear

Well I've decided to get back in the habit of riding my bicycle.It will be a training thing for Bear.I'll start in back yard just walking him around with bike beside him.

Bear saw me working on my old "Auto" bike this morning and he wasn't too sure of what was happening.Very skidish dog.

More to follow:

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Fwd: Fwd: Fwd;



Ever have one of those e-mails that you have to open page after page after page to see what the e-mail was really about?

And on each of those pages normally is a big list of e-mail addresses. And some wonder why they are getting spam or even worse MALWARE !

It takes just a little more time to “clean” that e-mail up to pass-on to others but is a lot safer for all concerned.

I for one, don’t like my e-mail address passed on to someone I don’t know.

Sneak attacks..where was our Intelligence info?



SEPTEMBER 11, 2001


On the morning of September 11, 2001, nineteen terrorists[2] affiliated with al-Qaeda[3] hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners. Each team of hijackers included a trained pilot. The hijackers crashed two of the airliners (United Airlines Flight 175 and American Airlines Flight 11) into the World Trade Center in New York City, one plane into each tower (1 WTC and 2 WTC), resulting in the collapse of both buildings soon afterward. A nearby church and the rest of the World Trade Center complex's 7 buildings were also destroyed or damaged beyond repair. A third airliner (American Airlines Flight 77) was crashed into the Pentagon in Arlington County, Virginia. Passengers and members of the flight crew on the fourth aircraft (United Airlines Flight 93) attempted to retake control of their plane from the hijackers; that plane crashed into a field near the town of Shanksville in rural Somerset County, Pennsylvania. In addition to the 19 hijackers, 2,973 people died; another 24 are missing and presumed dead






CONFIRMED DEAD: 2973REPORTED DEAD: 24REPORTED MISSING: 24TOTAL: 2996









On Sunday, December 7th, 1941 the Japanese launched a surprise attack

against the U.S. Forces stationed at Pearl Harbor , Hawaii . By planning

his attack on a Sunday, the Japanese commander Admiral Nagumo, hoped to

catch the entire fleet in port.

When it was over, the U.S.losses were:

Casualties

USA: 218 KIA, 364 WIA.

USN: 2,008 KIA, 710 WIA.

USMC: 109 KIA, 69 WIA.

Civilians: 68 KIA, 35 WIA.

TOTAL: 2,403 KIA, 1,178 WIA.

THESE PHOTOS ARE FROM A SAILOR WHO, I'M TOLD, WAS ON THE USS QUAPAW

ATF-11O. INTERESTING AS I'VE NEVER SEEN THEM ANYWHERE ELSE.











Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Videos

Just added first video of Bear and Goldie to Web Album "justmythoughts"
http://picasaweb.google.com/boblesterclwtr

Started to upload pictures to Picasa Web Albums


This is the start of an on going thing I've taken on. Google makes it easy to have a seamless way to keep track of my pictures ( over 7,000 last count) with Picasa,if you haven't tried it it is a free down load,and upload to my Albums easily out of the program.

Here is a link to my albums:
http://picasaweb.google.com/boblesterclwtr
Please check back every now and then, as it is going to take awhile to get it the way I want it.

Football Football Football

I have watched enough college football to last me a lifetime...others would say you can't get enough.

I found myself this last weekend SWITCHING BETWEEN CHANNELS to get in all the games.

I have a feeling the up coming Ohio game is going to be a disappointment..but we'll see.

Love those Trojans!!!

Facebook Badge